Solar geoengineering is often framed as a simple technical choice. CFG's submission to the UN Special Rapporteur argues the real question is who bears the risk, and whether future generations get a say.
A technology that could cool the planet is moving up the scientific and policy agenda, but most Europeans have never heard of it. We looked at what the public actually knows about solar radiation modification, and what they think once they do.
Private investment in solar radiation modification is outpacing governance. Giulia Neri argues Europe's political commitment now needs a research agenda and real diplomacy to back it up.
The debate around solar radiation modification tends to weigh risks for people alive today against risks for people alive tomorrow. CFG and the Jesuit European Social Centre argue that framing is too narrow — future generations, ecosystems, and non-human species all have a stake in how these decisions are made.
Existing international law does not effectively prevent a country from unilaterally deploying Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. We highlight why these legal gaps matter and highlights the governance challenges they raise.
This blog post introduces SAFEGEOGOV, a new project exploring how Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) can be governed responsibly.
